![]() ![]() If we approach a Single Session Therapy with the idea that we will hardly be able to find a focus for the client, this will undoubtedly lead us to failure. This dimension mainly concerns the mindset of the expert and how much this scenario is able to foresee. The therapeutic session will therefore be more effective precisely in terms of the amount of information transmitted and retained, postponing the possibility of change to a real experience, rather than to explanatory factors.ĭealing with a session thinking that it may be the only one represents one of the greatest difficulties for therapists approaching Single Session Therapy. This can be achieved, for example, through prescriptions to be carried out outside the study. Second, the change must be viewed in terms of specific goals, possibly described in behavioral terms. Therapists will then have to set up discussions on current and / or future-oriented information (not belonging to the past), selecting descriptive ones at the expense of explanatory ones.ĭoing so will highlight when, what, how and with whom the problem arises, thus favoring the level of interpersonal relationships. In Single Session Therapy, as well as in a walk-in session, it is necessary to restrict the “database size” through some procedures.įisch (1994) argues that the more focused and restricted the amount of information present in a therapeutic conversation, the shorter the therapy will be.įirst of all, the focus is on the problem and how it works in the present. In a therapy the amount of information transmitted by the client is usually very significant. The therapeutic alliance must therefore be strictly taken into consideration, but in light of what has just been said and the organizational structure of the intervention session. Listening and empathy (elements of a good relationship) must always be considered through the lens of time, requiring the therapist to carefully refine their skills, both in the choice of questions (which bring back to the focus), and in the ability to listening and relationship. In the sixty minutes available, you have plenty of time to build a good therapeutic alliance, as long as you focus on the most important aspects of the client’s story (Hoyt, 2009). ![]() The concept of time represents one of the crucial factors for a Walk-in Single Session Therapy therefore it is very important to estimate how the session is conceived and implemented, especially in terms of the patient-therapist relationship. It will be possible to obtain excellent food for thought even for those who do not usually practice Single Session Therapy, as the themes represented concern very important and delicate aspects of our clinical sector. ![]() The authors managed to condense a wide range of levels and concepts: both of theoretical / epistemological and technical / operational origin.Īs we have repeated several times, the Single Session Therapy differs (in some respects) from a walk-in session however, the elements presented in this article can be very useful both for those who approach TSS and for those who already know the subject. It is no coincidence that today’s article focuses on the 6 fundamental principles of clinical practice adopted within the Community Counseling Center in San Antonio (Texas), masterfully summarized by Slive and Bobele (2011). In recent years, much of the information, research and innovations regarding Single Session Therapy have come directly from the application field of walk-in centers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |