The following year, Pellaeon Lin, a Taiwan-based researcher at the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab, performed another technical analysis that reached similar conclusions. In 2020, The Washington Post worked with a privacy researcher to look under the hood at TikTok, concluding that the app does not appear to collect any more data than your typical mainstream social network. Independent researchers have backed Chew’s assertions. “I don’t believe what we collect is more than most players in the industry.” “We are committed to be very transparent with our users about what we collect,” Chew said. TikTok CEO stresses its practices are no different than US tech giantsĪs lawmakers doubled down on their questions about TikTok’s data collection practices, Chew also emphasized that the data TikTok collects is data “that’s frequently collected by many other companies in our industry.” “I don’t believe that TikTok - that you have said or done anything to convince us,” Eshoo said. So the risk would be similar to any government going to an American company, asking for data.” “Our commitment is to move their data into the United States, to be stored on American soil by an American company, overseen by American personnel. “I have looked in - and I have seen no evidence of this happening,” Chew responded. “I find that actually preposterous,” Eshoo fired back. Anna Eshoo, Chew talked up TikTok’s ongoing efforts to protect US user data and said he has “seen no evidence that the Chinese government has access to that data they have never asked us, we have not provided it.” In an exchange with California Democratic Rep. “To the American people watching today, hear this: TikTok is a weapon by the Chinese Communist Party to spy on you, manipulate what you see and exploit for future generations,” said Rep. Numerous members of Congress interrupted the chief executive’s testimony to say they simply don’t believe him. Much of Chew’s attempts to stress that his company is not an arm of the Chinese government appeared to fall on deaf ears. But since the Chinese government enjoys significant leverage over businesses under its jurisdiction, the theory goes that ByteDance, and thus indirectly, TikTok, could be forced to cooperate with a broad range of security activities, including possibly the transfer of TikTok data. We have addressed them with real action.” “Our approach has never been to dismiss or trivialize any of these concerns. “Still, we have heard important concerns about the potential for unwanted foreign access to US data and potential manipulation of the TikTok US ecosystem,” Chew said. “TikTok itself is not available in mainland China, we’re headquartered in Los Angeles and Singapore, and we have 7,000 employees in the U.S. What you should knowĬhew used his testimony to stress TikTok’s independence from China and play up its US ties. The US government is once again threatening to ban TikTok. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, the chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, opened Thursday’s hearing by telling Shou: “Your platform should be banned.” It offered a vivid display of the bipartisan push to crack down on the popular short-form video app and the company’s uphill battle to improve relations with Washington. The hearing, which lasted for more than five hours, kicked off with calls from a lawmaker to ban the app in the United States and remained combative throughout. Washington has already made up its mind about TikTok Here are the biggest takeaways from Thursday’s hearing. Yet his company’s app is among the most popular in America, with more than 150 million active users. It was a rare chance for the public to hear from the Chew, who offers very few interviews. In his first appearance before Congress on Thursday, TikTok CEO Shou Chew was grilled by lawmakers who expressed deep skepticism about his company’s attempts to protect US user data and ease concerns about its ties to China.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |